GetSales vs Hublead: HubSpot & Salesforce Compared 2026
GetSales runs outbound from its own CRM and syncs to HubSpot or Salesforce over an API. Hublead writes LinkedIn activity straight to your HubSpot or Salesforce timeline.
Your LinkedIn activity lands in GetSales first
Open GetSales and the first thing you meet is a CRM. Its own one. Lists, tags, custom fields, a deal pipeline, all of it sitting inside GetSales.
That single choice shapes everything that follows.
A prospect replies to your LinkedIn message. That reply lands in the GetSales inbox and the GetSales CRM. HubSpot or Salesforce hears about it later, over a sync. GetSales describes it as 'our built-in API for syncing with external CRMs.' Read the word external. To GetSales, HubSpot or Salesforce is the outside system.
So every record of your outbound has two homes. The live one in GetSales. The copy that trickles into your CRM.
Operationally, external means your CRM only learns what the sync chooses to tell it, on the sync's schedule. The live state of a conversation, the unread reply, the note a rep just added, all of it is current in GetSales and a few minutes stale in your CRM at best. Your reporting reads the copy, not the original.
If HubSpot or Salesforce is where your company actually runs, that's the wrong way round.
What HubSpot-first actually means
Hublead is a Chrome extension. It has no CRM of its own. It uses yours.
You message someone on LinkedIn. The message, the invite, the profile visit, they write straight onto that contact's HubSpot or Salesforce timeline. No second database. No sync delay. The activity sits in HubSpot or Salesforce because that's the only place it was ever stored. See how the HubSpot LinkedIn integration works.
Same logic for the work around the message. One-click bulk enrich pulls emails and phone numbers onto your HubSpot or Salesforce contacts straight from a CRM list. No export, no re-import. Multi-field dedup keeps you from spawning a duplicate every time you save a profile.
Run a quick scenario. A prospect replies on LinkedIn at 9am and your SLA says follow up within the hour. With Hublead that reply is already on the timeline, so a HubSpot or Salesforce workflow can flag it and the right rep sees it straight away. There's no sync window to clear first, because the activity was written to your CRM the moment it happened.
One workspace. Reps work in LinkedIn and HubSpot or Salesforce. Managers report from HubSpot or Salesforce. Same record, same minute.
Two systems drift. One system can't.
An API sync is fine right up until it isn't.
A field maps wrong. A reply arrives while the sync is paused. Someone edits a contact in GetSales while someone else edits the same contact in HubSpot or Salesforce. Now there are two versions of the truth and a meeting about which to believe.
The failure is rarely loud. The sync doesn't crash, it just lags or skips a field, and nobody notices until a report comes out wrong. Then you spend an afternoon proving which system was right instead of selling. Drift is cheap on day one and expensive at quarter close.
That's the quiet tax on any tool that owns its CRM and mirrors to yours. The harder your team leans on their CRM for reporting, routing, and workflows, the more that drift costs you.
Hublead closes the gap by deleting the second system. Nothing to reconcile, because there's one record.
It also means a LinkedIn event can fire a HubSpot or Salesforce workflow on its own. A connection accepted or a reply received drops onto the timeline, and your existing HubSpot or Salesforce automation treats it like any other event.
Where GetSales earns its price
This isn't a takedown. GetSales does one big thing Hublead flatly does not.
GetSales sends. Hublead sends nothing. Hublead records what you do by hand. It never fires an invite or a message for you.
So if you run outbound at volume across many seats, GetSales has the real machinery for it. Sender rotation across LinkedIn and email profiles. A cloud browser that isolates each LinkedIn session. Account health monitoring that watches more than 24 signals per profile and warns you before one trips a limit. Multichannel sequences. A shared inbox the whole team works from.
That's an agency stack. Many accounts, sending automated, safety watched at scale. If that's your job, GetSales is built for it and Hublead is not.
Worth saying plainly. A team using GetSales as its main CRM, with HubSpot or Salesforce as a side mirror, is using both tools the way they were drawn up. The friction only shows up when your CRM is meant to be the source of truth and GetSales sits upstream of it.
What each setup feels like day to day
Picture a rep on GetSales. They log into GetSales, work the shared inbox, watch sequences fire across the connected profiles, and keep an eye on the health dashboard. HubSpot or Salesforce is a tab they open to confirm the sync landed. Their day happens in GetSales.
Picture a rep on Hublead. They work in LinkedIn and their CRM, the two tabs already open. They send their own messages, and the extension writes each one onto the contact as they go. There's no third place to check, because there's no third system. Their day happens where it already happened.
That gap shows up in the small moments too. A manager asks why a deal stalled. On the GetSales setup the answer means opening GetSales, because that's where the live thread lives, then checking that HubSpot or Salesforce matches. On the Hublead setup the answer is already in the CRM, next to the emails and calls, because it was never stored anywhere else.
Neither is wrong. They suit different teams. The tell is simple. Count how many systems a rep has to trust at the end of the day. GetSales adds one. Hublead adds none. The more your reporting, routing and workflows already lean on HubSpot or Salesforce, the more that one extra system you have to trust starts to cost you.
Ready to fix your outbound process?
Feature comparison
Honest read. These tools overlap on the LinkedIn-to-CRM job and split on almost everything around it.
| What it does | GetSales | Hublead |
|---|---|---|
| Type of tool | Multichannel outreach platform with its own CRM | HubSpot & Salesforce-native Chrome extension |
| Sends LinkedIn messages and invites | Yes, automated, with sequences | No, you send by hand, it records |
| Has its own CRM | Yes, built-in Outreach CRM | No, it uses your HubSpot or Salesforce |
| CRM relationship | External CRM, connected by API sync | Native, writes to the timeline directly |
| Where LinkedIn activity lives | GetSales first, HubSpot or Salesforce after a sync | HubSpot & Salesforce, in real time |
| Sender rotation, multi-account | Yes, across LinkedIn and email profiles | No |
| Account health monitoring | Yes, more than 24 signals per profile | No |
| Cloud browser session isolation | Yes | No, runs in your own browser |
| Enrichment | Own enrich and email-finder credits | One-click bulk enrich from HubSpot or Salesforce lists |
| Trigger CRM workflows from LinkedIn | Indirect, after sync | Native, events hit the timeline |
| LinkedIn plan needed | Works with free, Premium, Sales Navigator | Works with free, Premium, Sales Navigator |
| Second system to reconcile | Yes, GetSales plus HubSpot or Salesforce | No, single CRM (HubSpot or Salesforce) |
| Setup | Heavier, profiles and senders to configure | Under 5 minutes |
| Starting price | From $29 per seat per month at volume on Send | From $32 per user per month |
| Rating | n/a here | 4.9 on the Chrome Web Store (141 reviews) |
Pricing, side by side
GetSales prices per seat, per month, and the rate drops as you add seats.
One seat runs $69 on Send, $89 on Enrich, $119 on Scale. At 10 seats those fall to $29, $40, and $55 a seat. At 100 seats they fall to $16, $20, and $30. Pay 6 months up front and you get a month free. Pay 12 months and you get 3 free, around 20 percent off.
Send is LinkedIn only. Enrich adds email, 3 inboxes per profile, and enrichment credits. Scale adds 20 inboxes per profile and priority support. The built-in CRM and account health monitoring come on every tier. HubSpot or Salesforce sync rides on the same API across plans.
Hublead starts at $32 per user per month. One product, not a ladder of channels. It works with free LinkedIn, Premium, or Sales Navigator, and setup runs under 5 minutes. The HubSpot LinkedIn guide walks through the workflow. Rated 4.9 on the Chrome Web Store (141 reviews).
The total cost splits the same way. GetSales bills per seat and per channel, and the real spend grows as you add senders and inboxes to push more volume. Hublead bills per seat, and that's the whole bill, because there's no sending engine to feed. You're paying GetSales to run an outbound machine. You're paying Hublead to keep one line clean. Different bills for different jobs, so compare the job first and the number second.
The prices aren't really comparable, because the products aren't. GetSales charges for a sending platform with its own CRM. Hublead charges for a clean line between LinkedIn and the HubSpot or Salesforce you already pay for.
Which one fits your team
Pick GetSales if you're an agency or an outbound team running many LinkedIn accounts, you want sending automated, and you're fine with GetSales holding your outbound while HubSpot or Salesforce mirrors it.
Pick Hublead if HubSpot or Salesforce is the source of truth, your reps send their own LinkedIn messages, and you want every invite, reply, and visit on the HubSpot or Salesforce timeline with no second workspace to check.
The both path is real for some teams. An outbound shop can run GetSales as its sending and account health engine while the company keeps HubSpot or Salesforce as the system of record, with Hublead writing the hand worked LinkedIn threads that GetSales never touches. That holds up as long as everyone agrees which system owns the truth. The friction only starts when two tools both claim it, and then you're back to reconciling records instead of selling.
Most HubSpot or Salesforce-first teams don't want another CRM sitting next to the one they already run. That's the whole reason Hublead exists.
Quick test if you're stuck. Ask where a new rep would go to answer what's the latest with this account. If the honest answer is GetSales, GetSales is your system of record and it should stay that way. If the honest answer is HubSpot or Salesforce, then LinkedIn living anywhere else is the bug, and Hublead is the fix.
Ready to fix your outbound process?
FAQs
Does GetSales integrate natively with HubSpot or Salesforce?
No. GetSales keeps outbound in its own built-in CRM and pushes to HubSpot or Salesforce through an API for syncing with external CRMs. Both are external systems to GetSales, so your LinkedIn activity lives in GetSales first and reaches your CRM over a sync.
Does Hublead send LinkedIn messages for me?
No. Hublead sends nothing. You send your invites and messages by hand, and Hublead records them onto the HubSpot or Salesforce timeline. It never automates outreach.
Can Hublead run multichannel sequences like GetSales?
No. There's no sequencing, no email sending, no sender rotation. Hublead logs LinkedIn activity to HubSpot or Salesforce and enriches your contacts. If you need automated multichannel sending across many accounts, that's GetSales territory.
Is GetSales better for agencies?
For running many LinkedIn accounts at volume with sender rotation, cloud browser isolation, and account health monitoring, yes. That multi-account sending machine is its real strength.
What does Hublead cost?
From $32 per user per month. It works with free LinkedIn, Premium, or Sales Navigator, and setup takes under 5 minutes.
Does Hublead need its own CRM?
No. Hublead has no CRM. It writes straight to your HubSpot or Salesforce, so there's no second database to keep in sync and nothing to reconcile.
Will LinkedIn activity trigger HubSpot or Salesforce workflows?
Yes. Messages, invites, and profile visits land on the HubSpot or Salesforce timeline, and your existing HubSpot or Salesforce automation can act on them like any other event.
What CRMs does Hublead support?
HubSpot and Salesforce. Hublead is built specifically for these two CRMs, which is why the timeline sync, one-click enrichment, and engagement-triggered workflows go deep instead of broad.
